AN INFORMED CHOICE
Both can give natural-looking results. The difference is in how they get there. Here is an honest comparison to help you decide what is right for you.
TWO APPROACHES
Traditional breast augmentation is a well-established, reliable procedure. To place the implant, the surgeon divides breast tissue and often the chest muscle to create a pocket, usually under general anaesthetic.
The Motiva Preservé technique takes a tissue-preserving approach. Using purpose-built instruments, it creates space for the implant by gently parting and stretching the tissue rather than cutting through it, so more of your natural anatomy stays intact.
Neither approach is universally better. The right choice depends on your anatomy, goals and preferences. Read more about the Motiva Preserve procedure.
PRESERVÉ AT A GLANCE
How Preservé typically differs from a conventional augmentation.
Breast Tissue
Anaesthetic
Scar
Recovery
Long-Term Position
Comparisons are general and based on the tissue-preserving nature of the technique. Your individual results and plan are discussed at consultation.
SIDE BY SIDE
TISSUE
Traditional augmentation divides muscle and tissue. Preservé parts and preserves it, keeping more of your natural structure and sensation.
ANAESTHETIC
Conventional augmentation is usually done under general anaesthetic. Preservé can often be performed under local anaesthetic with sedation.
SCAR
The purpose-built instruments allow a smaller incision than a typical augmentation, so scarring is often more discreet.
RECOVERY
Less tissue disruption usually means less bruising and a faster return to work and exercise.
THE ADVANTAGES
For suitable patients, the tissue-preserving approach can offer:
A BALANCED VIEW
Traditional augmentation is one of the most studied, reliable cosmetic procedures, with decades of outcomes behind it.
It is offered by more surgeons, whereas Preservé requires specific training and instruments.
For some anatomies or very large size changes, a conventional approach may be more suitable.
Where a lift or other surgery is needed, a traditional approach may form part of the plan.
WHICH IS RIGHT FOR YOU?
Preservé may be the better fit if:
EXPLORE MOTIVA PRESERVE
More on the Motiva Preserve procedure.
Verified patient reviews
Independently published reviews from Prof. Hindocha's breast surgery patients, quoted in full and exactly as written.
★★★★★
After years of being unhappy with my breasts after breastfeeding, I'm so glad I trusted my instincts and waited until I found the right surgeon. From my first consultation, Professor Hindocha made me feel completely at ease and I knew I could trust him. I'm only a week post-op and already love my results. I feel incredibly lucky to have found him and truly believe I found the best surgeon.
K.N.
Breast surgery patient
★★★★★
Excellent surgeon, highly recommend for breast augmentation under the muscle. He made me feel comfortable and didn't make me feel rushed in making decisions during my consultation right up to having surgery has been brilliant and also the after care. So pleased with my results.
C.S.
Breast augmentation patient
★★★★★
If you are wanting a breast reduction I would recommend Dr Sandip Hindocha! He has been brilliant from the consultation stage right through to after care! His team are amazing and will ensure that you are managing after surgery! You will feel at ease! I would 100% recommend!
G.H.
Breast reduction patient
Read all verified patient reviews
Patient stories describe individual experiences. Results vary from person to person, and the risks, limitations and likely outcome of any procedure are discussed with you at consultation.
TAKE THE FIRST STEP
Book today.
The best way to choose between Preservé and a traditional augmentation is a consultation. Prof. Sandip Hindocha will assess your anatomy and goals and recommend the most suitable approach for you.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Common questions about Preservé versus traditional augmentation.
